Chapter 1: The science and the scan
"Boring, But Necessary"
- Hybrid Imaging System
- Anatomic & Functional Exam
- The Machine
- “Whole Body” vs. “Skull Base to Mid-Thigh”
- Three Sets of Images
Produced
- Glucose Analog
- Malignancy & Glucose Metabolism
- Mechanisms for Increased Intracellular Glucose
- Why 18F-FDG Works
- Whole Body Assessment
- The “You’re Kidding Me!” Effect
- Post-Therapeutic Scar vs. Active Malignancy
- Detecting Malignancy
- Staging Malignancy
- Assess Response to Therapy
- Detecting Recurrence
- Not All Cancer is FDG-Avid
- Normal FDG-Uptake vs. Pathologic Uptake
- Technical Limitations
- Poor Patient Preparation
- Misregistration
- Brown Fat Activation
- SUV Problems
- Fields of View Discrepancy
- PET/CT Artifacts
- Timing of Exam After Therapy
- CT Images
- Non-Attenuation Corrected Images
- Attenuation Corrected Images
- Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP)
- Fusion of Images
- All Images Viewed in 3 Planes
7. Contrast Media: Oral & I.V.
- Who Gets Oral Contrast?
- Who Gets IV Contrast?
- Oral Contrast “Cocktail” Recipe
8. What the Patient Should Expect
- Documenting Height & Weight
- Private Resting Room
- Drinking PO Contrast
- FDG Injection
- Delay Between Injection & Scan
9. Safety Concerns with PET/CT Imaging
- Radiation Exposure to Patient
- Radiation Exposure to Patient’s Contacts
- Patient Contact with Pregnant Women
- Breastfeeding
Chapter 2: PET/CT Problems Which Limit Interpretation
"Something just doesn't seem right here"
- Optimizing Glucose & Insulin Levels
- Fasting Prior to Exam
- Diabetic Patients
- Low Carbohydrate Diet
- Hydration
- Strenuous Exercise
- Voiding Prior to Exam
- Patient Instruction Sheet
- Definition
- Distribution / Appearance
- Don’t Miss the Hidden Nod
- Reporting Language
- Prevention
3. Timing of PET/CT Exam After Therapy
- “Rule of 3”
- Chemotherapy: 1 month
- Surgery: 2 months
- Radiation: 3 months
- Etiology: Hybrid Imaging
- Patient Movement
- Respiratory Motion
- Breathing Techniques
- Bowel Peristalsis
- False Positives
- False Negatives
- Reporting Language
- Beam Hardening
- Diaphragmatic Mismatch
- Linear Hand Motion
- Attenuation Correction
- Differing Fields of View
- Poor Patient Preparation
- FDG Extravasation
- Extensive Brown Fat
- Metformin-Induced Bowel Uptake
- Marked Reactive Marrow Uptake
- Extensive Tumor Uptake in
- Different Types of SUV Measurements
- Factors that Influence SUV Measurements
- What SUV Number Indicates Malignancy?
- What Percent Change in SUV on a Follow Up Exam is Significant?
- How to Compare Exams With Very Different Background Metabolic Activities?
Chapter 3: The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)
"The good, the bad & the ugly"
1. What is the SUV & Why Used?
- Quantitative vs. Qualitative Assessment
- Unitless Measurement
- Formula
- SUV = ?
- Patient Preparation
- Time Between FDG Injection & Scan
- Partial Volume Effects
- Extravasation
- Patient Weight
- Size & Position of ROI
- Attenuation Correction Artifacts
- Consensus?
- Body Weight
- Lean Body Mass
- Ideal Body Weight
- Body Surface Area
- Maximum vs. Mean
- Average SUV’s by Organ
4. Interpreting the SUV: Threshold Values, “Oncologic Plausibility” & Relative Uptake
- Precise Threshold Values?
- “Oncologic Plausibility”
- Relative Uptake
- Assessing Nodes in Lymphoma Cases
- Assessing Nodes in Non-Lymphoma Cases
- Potential Lesions in Solid Organs
- Pulmonary Nodules
5. What % Change in SUV on a Follow Up Exam is Clinically Significant?
- The Problem
- Current Recommendations
6. How to Compare Sequential Exams With Very Different Background Activities?
- Differing Background Metabolic Activities
- When Qualitative Assessment is Required
- Reporting Language
7. Should We Just Abandon the SUV?
- Pros & Cons
- “Qualitative” Definitions
- Mild
- Moderate
- Intense
- Final Recommendations
Chapter 4: Our Systematic Approach to Reading a PET/CT
"Eat your vegetables"
1. Reading Station & Reading Software
- Reading Station
- Monitor Set-Up
- PET/CT Reading Software
- Hanging Protocol
- Reading in Context (“Oncologic Plausibility”)
- Measure Size on CT, Not on PET Images
- Abnormality Seen Only on First PET Image
- Assess the Patient’s Main Pathology Last
- Beware the Ureter
3. Excellent Views: The MIP, Coronal & Sagittal Images
- 3-D Rotating MIP & Coronal “Quick MIP”
- Coronal PET
- Sagittal PET
4. Written Annotations While Reading
- Numbers, Numbers & More Numbers
- Size & SUV Annotation System
- Sample Annotation Sheet
- Goals of Reporting
- Lawyers, Lawyers & Lawyers
- Sample PET/CT Report
- Negative Exam
- Positive Exam
- Patient Questionnaire
- Technologist’s Data Sheet
- Huge Exam: Requires Systematic Approach
- Our “12-Step Reading System”
- “The Read” in Action: Sample Case (Video)
- Annotations for Sample Case
- Final Report for Sample Case
Chapter 5: Normal Physiologic Distribution of FDG
"The essentials"
- To Locate Cancer, First Eliminate:
- Normal FDG-Avid “Structures”
- Benign FDG-Avid “Findings”
Chapter 6: Benign FDG-Avid "Findings" & Common Diagnostic Challenges
"Separating the Expert from the Not-So-Expert"
3. Chest
- Inflammatory Lymph Nodes
- Thymic Rebound
- Pleura: Talc Pleurodesis vs. Malignancy vs. Inflammation
-
Radiation-Induced Lung Disease
- Radiation Pneumonitis
- Radiation Fibrosis
- "Post-Therapeutic Inflammatory Changes" / Scarring of the Lung
- Atelectasis / Infiltrate
- Lipomatous Hypertrophy of the Inter-Atrial Septum
- Elastofibroma Dorsi
- Site of Prior Chest Port
- Esophagitis vs. Neoplasm
- Subcutaneous & Intramuscular Medical Injections
- Injected FDG-Blood Clot
4. Abdomen & Pelvis
- The Heterogeneous Liver
- Liver Ablation
- Hypermetabolic Geographic Fatty Infiltration
- Hypermetabolic Hepatic Adenoma
- FDG-Avid Adrenal Gland Algorithm
- Therapy-Induced Splenic Activation
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Pre-Sacral Soft Tissue After Rectal Surgery
- Gallbladder: Cholecystitis vs. Malignancy
- Inguinal Herniorraphy
- Bladder in Inguinal Canal
- Uterine Fibroid
- Tampon
5. Miscellaneous (continued)
-
Vascular Uptake
- Atherosclerosis
- Vasculitis
- Vascular Grafts
-
Value of NAC PET Images
- Resolving AC Artifacts
- Lung Nodule Identification
-
Non-Malignant, Yet Clinically Significant, FDG-Avid CT Abnormalies
- Acute Diverticulitis
- Colitis
- Cholecystitis
- Pneumonia
- Abscess
- Pancreatitis
- Skeletal Abnormalities [See Chapter 7]
Chapter 7: The Bones
"...is connected to the..."
Chapter 8: The Cancers
"Putting it all together"
FDG-Uptake in the Adrenal Glands
The adrenal glands are a common challenge for the PET/CT radiologist because:
- They are a very common site of metastatic disease; and
- Benign adrenal lesions are common (≈ 5% incidence in general population) and can be hypermetabolic.
The normal adrenal glands typically demonstrate little or no FDG uptake.
It is not uncommon for one adrenal to be mildly FDG-avid, while the other is non-avid.
Assessment of adrenal lesions is as much art as science. While the PET/CT radiologist may not always be able to provide a definitive diagnosis, we are expected to strongly suggest a diagnosis in the majority of cases.
Based on our experience in assessing thousands of adrenal lesions, we utilize the following diagnostic algorithm (which must always be applied in the context of the patient’s primary malignancy and specific presentation – “oncologic plausibility”) for the following presentations:
- Lipid-Rich or Fat-Containing Nodules/Nodularity (Unilateral or Bilateral)
- FDG Uptake in NORMAL Appearing Adrenal Gland – Unilateral or Bilateral
- Unilateral or Bilateral Adrenal Nodule (or “Nodularity”, “Fullness”, “Enlargement”), with INDETERMINATE CT Appearance
Lipid-Rich or Fat-Containing Nodules/Nodularity (Unilateral or Bilateral):
- “Lipid-Rich” (H.U. <10): If an adrenal nodule demonstrates a Hounsfield measurement of less than 10 units, we report it as a benign adenoma, irrespective of its metabolic activity.
- Caveat: If only a portion of an FDG-avid adrenal nodule demonstrates a Hounsfield measurement of less than 10 units, we occasionally recommend MRI characterization (as this could represent a necrotic metastasis).
- “Fat-Containing” Nodule: If an adrenal nodule contains any measurable focus of fat-equivalent density, we report it as a benign myelolipoma, irrespective of its metabolic activity.
- While most adrenal adenomas and myelolipomas demonstrate little or no FDG-uptake, they can occasionally be hypermetabolic. Even when intensely-avid, however, they are considered benign.
FDG Uptake in NORMAL CT Appearing Adrenal Glands (Unilateral or Bilateral):
- If Adrenal Uptake ≤ Liver Uptake:
- In these cases, we simply report that such metabolic activity “typically reflects normal physiologic uptake.”
- If Adrenal Uptake > Liver Uptake:
- While such intense uptake is often physiologic, we are more cautious in our assessment: “While this often represents normal physiologic uptake, follow-up may be warranted to exclude an early adrenal metastasis.”
FDG Uptake in Adrenal Nodule (or “Nodularity” or “Fullness”), with INDETERMINATE CT Appearance (Unilateral or Bilateral):
- If Adrenal Uptake ≤ Liver Uptake: “Its lack of significant metabolic activity suggests this represents a benign finding, such as…. ”
- (If appears as a nodule on CT: “…such as a benign adenoma.”)
- (If appears as fullness on CT: “such as adenomatous change or benign hyperplasia”.)
- If Adrenal Uptake > Liver Uptake:
- If Clinical Suspicion of Metastatic Disease: “The appearance is highly suspicious for metastatic disease. MRI characterization may be of diagnostic value, if clinically warranted.”
- If Low Clinical Suspicion of Metastatic Disease (Incidental Finding): “While this can reflect hyperplasia or adenomatous change, malignancy must be excluded in this case. MRI characterization may be of diagnostic value, if clinically warranted.”


























