Chapter 1: The Science & The Scan
Chapter 1: The science and the scan
"Boring, But Necessary"
- Hybrid Imaging System
- Anatomic & Functional Exam
- The Machine
- “Whole Body” vs. “Skull Base to Mid-Thigh”
- Three Sets of Images
Produced
- Glucose Analog
- Malignancy & Glucose Metabolism
- Mechanisms for Increased Intracellular Glucose
- Why 18F-FDG Works
- Whole Body Assessment
- The “You’re Kidding Me!” Effect
- Post-Therapeutic Scar vs. Active Malignancy
- Detecting Malignancy
- Staging Malignancy
- Assess Response to Therapy
- Detecting Recurrence
- Not All Cancer is FDG-Avid
- Normal FDG-Uptake vs. Pathologic Uptake
- Technical Limitations
- Poor Patient Preparation
- Misregistration
- Brown Fat Activation
- SUV Problems
- Fields of View Discrepancy
- PET/CT Artifacts
- Timing of Exam After Therapy
- CT Images
- Non-Attenuation Corrected Images
- Attenuation Corrected Images
- Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP)
- Fusion of Images
- All Images Viewed in 3 Planes
7. Contrast Media: Oral & I.V.
- Who Gets Oral Contrast?
- Who Gets IV Contrast?
- Oral Contrast “Cocktail” Recipe
8. What the Patient Should Expect
- Documenting Height & Weight
- Private Resting Room
- Drinking PO Contrast
- FDG Injection
- Delay Between Injection & Scan
9. Safety Concerns with PET/CT Imaging
- Radiation Exposure to Patient
- Radiation Exposure to Patient’s Contacts
- Patient Contact with Pregnant Women
- Breastfeeding
Chapter 2: PET/CT Problems Which Limit Interpretation
Chapter 2: PET/CT Problems Which Limit Interpretation
"Something just doesn't seem right here"
- Optimizing Glucose & Insulin Levels
- Fasting Prior to Exam
- Diabetic Patients
- Low Carbohydrate Diet
- Hydration
- Strenuous Exercise
- Voiding Prior to Exam
- Patient Instruction Sheet
- Definition
- Distribution / Appearance
- Don’t Miss the Hidden Nod
- Reporting Language
- Prevention
3. Timing of PET/CT Exam After Therapy
- “Rule of 3”
- Chemotherapy: 1 month
- Surgery: 2 months
- Radiation: 3 months
- Etiology: Hybrid Imaging
- Patient Movement
- Respiratory Motion
- Breathing Techniques
- Bowel Peristalsis
- False Positives
- False Negatives
- Reporting Language
- Beam Hardening
- Diaphragmatic Mismatch
- Linear Hand Motion
- Attenuation Correction
- Differing Fields of View
- Poor Patient Preparation
- FDG Extravasation
- Extensive Brown Fat
- Metformin-Induced Bowel Uptake
- Marked Reactive Marrow Uptake
- Extensive Tumor Uptake in
- Different Types of SUV Measurements
- Factors that Influence SUV Measurements
- What SUV Number Indicates Malignancy?
- What Percent Change in SUV on a Follow Up Exam is Significant?
- How to Compare Exams With Very Different Background Metabolic Activities?
Chapter 3: The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)
Chapter 3: The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)
"The good, the bad & the ugly"
1. What is the SUV & Why Used?
- Quantitative vs. Qualitative Assessment
- Unitless Measurement
- Formula
- SUV = ?
- Patient Preparation
- Time Between FDG Injection & Scan
- Partial Volume Effects
- Extravasation
- Patient Weight
- Size & Position of ROI
- Attenuation Correction Artifacts
- Consensus?
- Body Weight
- Lean Body Mass
- Ideal Body Weight
- Body Surface Area
- Maximum vs. Mean
- Average SUV’s by Organ
4. Interpreting the SUV: Threshold Values, “Oncologic Plausibility” & Relative Uptake
- Precise Threshold Values?
- “Oncologic Plausibility”
- Relative Uptake
- Assessing Nodes in Lymphoma Cases
- Assessing Nodes in Non-Lymphoma Cases
- Potential Lesions in Solid Organs
- Pulmonary Nodules
5. What % Change in SUV on a Follow Up Exam is Clinically Significant?
- The Problem
- Current Recommendations
6. How to Compare Sequential Exams With Very Different Background Activities?
- Differing Background Metabolic Activities
- When Qualitative Assessment is Required
- Reporting Language
7. Should We Just Abandon the SUV?
- Pros & Cons
- “Qualitative” Definitions
- Mild
- Moderate
- Intense
- Final Recommendations
Chapter 4: Our Systematic Approach to Reading a PET/CT
Chapter 4: Our Systematic Approach to Reading a PET/CT
"Eat your vegetables"
1. Reading Station & Reading Software
- Reading Station
- Monitor Set-Up
- PET/CT Reading Software
- Hanging Protocol
- Reading in Context (“Oncologic Plausibility”)
- Measure Size on CT, Not on PET Images
- Abnormality Seen Only on First PET Image
- Assess the Patient’s Main Pathology Last
- Beware the Ureter
3. Excellent Views: The MIP, Coronal & Sagittal Images
- 3-D Rotating MIP & Coronal “Quick MIP”
- Coronal PET
- Sagittal PET
4. Written Annotations While Reading
- Numbers, Numbers & More Numbers
- Size & SUV Annotation System
- Sample Annotation Sheet
- Goals of Reporting
- Lawyers, Lawyers & Lawyers
- Sample PET/CT Report
- Negative Exam
- Positive Exam
- Patient Questionnaire
- Technologist’s Data Sheet
- Huge Exam: Requires Systematic Approach
- Our “12-Step Reading System”
- “The Read” in Action: Sample Case (Video)
- Annotations for Sample Case
- Final Report for Sample Case
Chapter 5: Normal Physiologic Distribution of FDG
Chapter 5: Normal Physiologic Distribution of FDG
"The essentials"
- To Locate Cancer, First Eliminate:
- Normal FDG-Avid “Structures”
- Benign FDG-Avid “Findings”
Chapter 6: Benign FDG-Avid “Findings” & Common Diagnostic Challenges
Chapter 6: Benign FDG-Avid "Findings" & Common Diagnostic Challenges
"Separating the Expert from the Not-So-Expert"
3. Chest
- Inflammatory Lymph Nodes
- Thymic Rebound
- Pleura: Talc Pleurodesis vs. Malignancy vs. Inflammation
-
Radiation-Induced Lung Disease
- Radiation Pneumonitis
- Radiation Fibrosis
- "Post-Therapeutic Inflammatory Changes" / Scarring of the Lung
- Atelectasis / Infiltrate
- Lipomatous Hypertrophy of the Inter-Atrial Septum
- Elastofibroma Dorsi
- Site of Prior Chest Port
- Esophagitis vs. Neoplasm
- Subcutaneous & Intramuscular Medical Injections
- Injected FDG-Blood Clot
4. Abdomen & Pelvis
- The Heterogeneous Liver
- Liver Ablation
- Hypermetabolic Geographic Fatty Infiltration
- Hypermetabolic Hepatic Adenoma
- FDG-Avid Adrenal Gland Algorithm
- Therapy-Induced Splenic Activation
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Pre-Sacral Soft Tissue After Rectal Surgery
- Gallbladder: Cholecystitis vs. Malignancy
- Inguinal Herniorraphy
- Bladder in Inguinal Canal
- Uterine Fibroid
- Tampon
5. Miscellaneous (continued)
-
Vascular Uptake
- Atherosclerosis
- Vasculitis
- Vascular Grafts
-
Value of NAC PET Images
- Resolving AC Artifacts
- Lung Nodule Identification
-
Non-Malignant, Yet Clinically Significant, FDG-Avid CT Abnormalies
- Acute Diverticulitis
- Colitis
- Cholecystitis
- Pneumonia
- Abscess
- Pancreatitis
- Skeletal Abnormalities [See Chapter 7]
Chapter 7: The Bones
Chapter 7: The Bones
"...is connected to the..."
Chapter 8: The Cancers
Chapter 8: The Cancers
"Putting it all together"
Baastrup Disease (Interspinous Uptake of FDG)
Baastrup’s Disease (“kissing spine”) is the result of degenerative changes between adjacent spinous processes and inflammation of the interspinous soft tissues. Patients are typically asymptomatic.
It has a very characteristic PET/CT appearance, with single or multiple levels of linear uptake present in the interspinous regions (best appreciated on the sagittal fused images).
It should not be confused with metastatic disease to the spinous process (always confirm the interspinous location of this uptake on the sagittal view, not in the axial plane).
Case 1
Case 1 (Image 2)
The corresponding sagittal CT images reveal the focus of intense uptake to lie between two contiguous spinous processes (“interspinous”). The spinous processes themselves are unremarkable. This is the typical PET/CT appearance of Baastrup Disease, a non-neoplastic finding.
Case 1 (Image 3)
Corresponding coronal images also demonstrate the interspinous location of the metabolic activity.
Case 2
Case 2 (Image 2)
Sagittal CT images confirm the uptake to be interspinous in location, characteristic of Baastrup Disease.
Case 2 (Image 3)
Corresponding coronal images also demonstrate the interspinous location of the metabolic activity, diagnostic of Baastrup Disease.
Case 3
Case 3 (Image 2)
The corresponding sagittal CT images, however, reveal that this uptake is not interspinous, but is actually located within the spinous process. Even though an associated osseous lesion is not clearly demonstrated on the bone windows, this is highly suspicious for metastatic disease.
Case 4
Case 4 (Image 2)
Corresponding sagittal CT images confirm the hypermetabolic lytic metastasis within the spinous process (certainly not “interspinous” in location).